HP EliteBook 845 G10 The almost perfect business laptop with AMD Zen4

120 Hz and 5G. HP is presenting its best, AMD-equipped business notebook in the new EliteBook 845 G10. The Ryzen 9 Pro 7940HS offers a lot of performance and the EliteBook doesn’t have any weakness in other areas either. Only the RAM configuration is not optimal.

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by Jacob Fisher), Published 08/15/2023 🇩🇪

The EliteBook 840 series is HP’s category of high-quality 14-inch business laptops that compete directly with Lenovo’s ThinkPad T14s series. Just like Lenovo, HP offers the model with both Intel CPUs (EliteBook 840) and AMD processors (EliteBook 845). Above the EliteBook 840 is the EliteBook 1040 flagship, which (like the ThinkPad X1 Carbon) is only available with an Intel CPU.

The 10th generation comes with minor updates, but the basic case design remains unchanged. Our test device is the HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA for EUR 2,249 (or EUR 1,835 for students) and offers the new Zen4 processor AMD Ryzen 9 Pro 7940HS as well as a new 120 Hz screen with a resolution of 2,560 x 1,600. Other features include a 1 TB SSD, 32 GB of RAM, and a 5G modem.

Processor

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 8 x 4 – 5.2 GHz, 51 W PL2 / Short Burst, 41 W PL1 / Sustained, Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)

Memory

32 GB

, DDR5-5600, single channel, 2 slots, max. 64 GB

Display

14.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 216 PPI, AUO6DA8, IPS, glossy: yes, 120 Hz

Mainboard

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Soundcard

AMD Zen – Audio Processor – HD Audio Controller

Connections

2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor

Networking

Realtek 8852CE (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.0, LTE, 5G

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 17.9 x 323.6 x 214.7 ( = 0.7 x 12.74 x 8.45 in)

Battery

51 Wh, 4249 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Camera

Webcam: 5 MP with IR
Primary Camera: 5 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 65W PSU, 36 Months Warranty

Weight

1.466 kg ( = 51.71 oz / 3.23 pounds), Power Supply: 314 g ( = 11.08 oz / 0.69 pounds)

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

HP mainly uses aluminum for the case of the EliteBook 845 G10 and the build does not differ from last year’s G9 model. The silver-colored case is overall very restrained and does not have any color contrasts apart from the reflective HP logo on the lid and the black keyboard. The surfaces are overall very fingerprint- and dirt resistant.

The stability of the base unit is very good and no creaking noises are emitted. The hinges are well adjusted and the maximum opening angle is 180 degrees. The display lid itself is a little more flexible, but we were unable to elicit any image distortions. The screen bezels on the sides are very narrow and only a bit thicker above and below, but there is no camera hump.

At 1.466 kg, the EliteBook 845 G10 is no lightweight and also lands in last place in our comparison group. It is also a little wider than rival devices, but not quite as thick. The very compact 65-watt power supply adds another 300 grams to the scales.

HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE Dell Latitude 7440 Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti DIN A4 323.6 mm / 12.7 inch 214.7 mm / 8.45 inch 17.9 mm / 0.705 inch 1.5 kg3.23 lbs317.5 mm / 12.5 inch 226.9 mm / 8.93 inch 16.9 mm / 0.665 inch 1.3 kg2.91 lbs313 mm / 12.3 inch 220.2 mm / 8.67 inch 17.95 mm / 0.707 inch 1.2 kg2.69 lbs310 mm / 12.2 inch 221 mm / 8.7 inch 15.6 mm / 0.614 inch 1.3 kg2.78 lbs308.8 mm / 12.2 inch 215 mm / 8.46 inch 16.6 mm / 0.654 inch 1.3 kg2.89 lbs297 mm / 11.7 inch 210 mm / 8.27 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

The port selection is very good. Apart from a card reader, all important ports, including a SmartCard reader (e.g. for company ID cards), are available. The two USB-C ports support the USB 4.0 standard and thus allow the connecting of external graphics cards.

The WLAN module comes from Realtek (8852CE) and also supports the current Wi-Fi 6E standard. We were able to connect to the corresponding 6 GHz network of our Asus reference router without issue in our tests. Transfer rates and signal stability are excellent, and the results are better than those of the competition. A network port is not available, but can be added via an optional USB adapter. In addition, a 5G modem from Fibocom is installed in our test device (FM350GL) and you can use either a nano-SIM card or an eSIM.

Networking
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA Realtek 8852CE
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1820 (min: 1772) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1749 (min: 1715) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE Qualcomm WCN685x
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1594 (min: 818) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1712 (min: 1683) MBit/s ∼100%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	767 (min: 626) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1239 (min: 1088) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1009 (min: 740) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1223 (min: 1075) MBit/s ∼70%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	591 (min: 549) MBit/s ∼37%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	938 (min: 925) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1353 (min: 1192) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1682 (min: 868) MBit/s ∼96%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1458 (min: 1294) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1570 (min: 1446) MBit/s ∼92%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA Qualcomm Fast Connect 6900 Wi-Fi 6E Dual Band Simultaneous
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1375 (min: 748) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1662 (min: 1357) MBit/s ∼95%

HP installs a 5 MP camera and the image quality is significantly better than the usual 1080p models, especially in terms of image sharpness. The color accuracy is not optimal, but you can easily do without an external webcam, especially for video conferences. An IR camera is also installed for facial recognition via Windows Hello.

ColorChecker HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA: 13.53 ∆E min: 2.33 – max: 22.15 ∆E

The base plate is secured with five regular Phillips screws and is easy to remove. The maintenance options are overall very good because there are two RAM slots next to the SSD. These are located under additional covers, but they are only clamped. The WLAN and WWAN modules are also plugged in.

The keyboard of the EliteBook 845 G10 is one of the best laptop keyboards on the market. Key travel is around 1.5 mm and the feedback is very precise. Subjectively, we prefer this keyboard more than in the current ThinkPad models. The only two aspects that require getting used to are the small arrow keys and the power button, of which the latter is integrated into the top right of the keyboard. The fingerprint scanner is located below the keyboard.

HP has been doing away with the pointstick in the middle of the keyboard and the accompanying dedicated mouse buttons for some time now and uses a regular ClickPad instead. However, this is not necessarily a drawback and the ClickPad works very well. The smooth surface offers good gliding properties and implements all inputs (including multi-touch gestures) without limitations.

HP offers various displays for the EliteBook 845 G10. We cannot recommend the 250 nits IPS display (which is not available in all regions) or the SureView display (up to 1,000 nits, but poor subjective image quality). On the other hand, the 400 nits IPS display (Full HD) is a solid screen that offers the best runtimes thanks to lower power consumption. The optional 120 Hz IPS display with 2560×1600 and an anti-glare surface is installed in our test device. The screen is not completely matte, but reflections are minimal.

Our subjective impression of the picture quality is overall very good because colors look vivid and content is very sharp. Bright areas appear slightly grainy at very short distances, but this is not an issue at a normal sitting distance. HP specifies a brightness of 500 cd/m², which is clearly exceeded by our test device at an average of 560 cd/m². The black value of 0.38 cd/m² suffers a little under the high brightness, but the overall contrast ratio is still nearly 1500:1. PWM is not used and the response times are very good for an IPS panel, but there are slighly visible halos, especially at the upper edge.


542 cd/m²	525 cd/m²	591 cd/m²
567 cd/m²	546 cd/m²	608 cd/m²
560 cd/m²	536 cd/m²	599 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

AUO6DA8

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 608 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 563.8 cd/m² Minimum: 26.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 549 cd/m²
Contrast: 1437:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.1, calibrated: 1.2
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
86.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27

HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AUO6DA8, IPS, 2560×1600, 14.00

Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
MNE007JA1-1, LTPS IPS LED, 1920×1200, 14.00

Dell Latitude 7440
AU Optronics B140QAX, IPS, 2560×1600, 14.00

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
TMX1422, IPS, 3120×2080, 14.20

SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
MNE007ZA1-1, IPS, 2880×1800, 14.00

HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
InfoVision X140NV4J, IPS, 1920×1200, 14.00

Display

-15%

-12%

-4%

-13%

-17%

Display P3 Coverage

98.3

69.4

-29%

75.4

-23%

89.8

-9%

74.1

-25%

-30%

sRGB Coverage

99.8

99.9

99.4

97.4

-2%

-1%

AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage

86.2

71.4

-17%

76.2

-12%

84.2

-2%

75.3

-13%

-19%

Response Times

-189%

-316%

-23%

-116%

-155%

Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *

12.7

The panel is already very well calibrated in its delivery state. Our analysis with professional CalMAN software (X-Rite i1 Pro 2) reveals that the grayscale display is already on the reference level and no color cast is visible. In terms of colors, only blue is above the important deviation of 3, which are unable to correct via our own calibration. The P3 color space is fully covered, but there is no option to switch the color space to sRGB.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
7.9 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.1 ms rise
7.9 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
12.7 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.8 ms rise
12.7 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (34.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession – a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18982 (minimum: 5 – maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Thanks to the high screen brightness, you can often find a place outdoors where you can work properly. However, direct sunlight should be avoided. The viewing angle stability is good overall, but the image brightens up quickly, especially from an above angle. Better IPS panels are available here.

HP offers the EliteBook 845 G10 with the latest Ryzen CPUs from AMD. Our test device uses the fastest option, the 35-watt Ryzen 9 Pro 7940HS. Ryzen 5 or Ryzen 7 models of the U series are also optionally available. Our test device is also equipped with a 32 GB RAM module, which has a negative impact on graphics performance. Of course, this is not the most important factor in a business laptop, but it makes little sense not to utilize the hardware. We also ran some GPU and gaming benchmarks in dual-channel configuration (2x 16 GB DDR5-5600).

HP doesn’t offer any additional energy settings; the regular Windows profiles are used instead. The Ryzen 9 Pro 7940HS consumes a maximum of 51 watts, but 35 watts in the most energy-efficient mode. That is also the disadvantage of the HS processor because users don’t always need that much power in everyday office use. The U-series chips should have an advantage here because they can be configured with lower power limits.

The Ryzen 9 Pro 7940HS stems from AMD’s current Phoenix generation and offers 8 Zen4 cores. The chip is manufactured in a modern 4 nm process and can run a maximum of 16 threads simultaneously. The chip consumes a maximum of 51 watts and 41 watts permanently, which leads to very good results in the benchmarks. Overall, performance remains very stable and all other comparison devices are clearly surpassed, at least in the multi-core benchmarks. The advantage over last year’s EliteBook 845 G9 with its Ryzen 9 Pro 6950HS is 19% on average, but single-core performance has increased only minimally. Intel still has an advantage here with the performance cores, although the power consumption is also higher. On battery power, CPU performance remains constant. More CPU benchmarks are available in our tech section.

CPU Performance Rating
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	83.5 pt ∼84%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	83.5 pt ∼84%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	83.4 pt ∼83%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	78.2 pt ∼78%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS	70 pt ∼70%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U	69.2 pt ∼69%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	68.3 pt ∼68%
Average of class Office	47.4 pt ∼47%

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	14919 Points ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	14919 Points ∼100% 0%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	14917 Points ∼100% 0%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	11571 Points ∼78% -22%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS	11515 (11150.7^min – 11515.3^max) Points ∼77% -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	10031 Points ∼67% -33%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U	9795 (7630.48^min – 9794.71^max) Points ∼66% -34%
Average of class Office (830 – 14919, n=128, last 2 years)	6460 Points ∼43% -57%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	1848 Points ∼100% +18%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U	1757 Points ∼95% +12%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	1678 Points ∼91% +7%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	1568 Points ∼85%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	1568 Points ∼85% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	1520 Points ∼82% -3%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS	1514 Points ∼82% -3%
Average of class Office (321 – 1995, n=126, last 2 years)	1337 Points ∼72% -15%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	5790 Points ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	5790 Points ∼100% 0%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	5762 Points ∼100% 0%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS	4577 Points ∼79% -21%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	4526 Points ∼78% -22%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	3879 Points ∼67% -33%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U	3610 Points ∼62% -38%
Average of class Office (323 – 5790, n=128, last 2 years)	2498 Points ∼43% -57%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	719 Points ∼100% +18%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	701 Points ∼97% +15%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U	656 Points ∼91% +7%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	611 Points ∼85%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	611 Points ∼85% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	594 Points ∼83% -3%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS	591 Points ∼82% -3%
Average of class Office (114 – 764, n=128, last 2 years)	514 Points ∼71% -16%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	2360 (2299.38^min – 2359.74^max) Points ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	2360 Points ∼100% 0%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	2166 (1948.94^min – 2166.26^max) Points ∼92% -8%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	2008 Points ∼85% -15%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS	1913 (1872.75^min – 1912.59^max) Points ∼81% -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	1686 (1589.76^min – 1685.63^max) Points ∼71% -29%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U	1542 (929.37^min – 1541.9^max) Points ∼65% -35%
Average of class Office (160.8 – 2492, n=127, last 2 years)	1134 Points ∼48% -52%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	267 Points ∼100% +8%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	263 Points ∼99% +6%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	247 Points ∼93%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	247 Points ∼93% 0%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U	244 Points ∼91% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	241 Points ∼90% -2%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS	239 Points ∼90% -3%
Average of class Office (80.1 – 284, n=123, last 2 years)	201 Points ∼75% -19%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Office (215 – 3895, n=129, last 2 years)	698 Seconds * ∼100% -225%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U	332 Seconds * ∼48% -54%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	306 Seconds * ∼44% -42%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	295 Seconds * ∼42% -37%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS	264 Seconds * ∼38% -23%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	262 Seconds * ∼38% -22%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	215 Seconds * ∼31%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	215 Seconds * ∼31% -0%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	61303 MIPS ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	61303 MIPS ∼100% 0%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	50517 MIPS ∼82% -18%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS	49474 MIPS ∼81% -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	48204 MIPS ∼79% -21%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	45679 MIPS ∼75% -25%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U	40563 MIPS ∼66% -34%
Average of class Office (4226 – 61303, n=128, last 2 years)	28281 MIPS ∼46% -54%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	5844 MIPS ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	5844 MIPS ∼100% 0%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	5833 MIPS ∼100% 0%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	5717 MIPS ∼98% -2%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS	5516 MIPS ∼94% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	5338 MIPS ∼91% -9%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U	5296 MIPS ∼91% -9%
Average of class Office (2059 – 6687, n=129, last 2 years)	4736 MIPS ∼81% -19%

Geekbench 5.4 / Multi-Core
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	10976 Points ∼100% +11%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	9897 Points ∼90%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	9897 Points ∼90% 0%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	8909 Points ∼81% -10%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U	8263 Points ∼75% -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	7884 Points ∼72% -20%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS	7664 Points ∼70% -23%
Average of class Office (1018 – 11744, n=126, last 2 years)	5512 Points ∼50% -44%

Geekbench 5.4 / Single-Core
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	1792 Points ∼100% +2%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	1778 Points ∼99% +1%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	1758 Points ∼98%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	1758 Points ∼98% 0%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U	1710 Points ∼95% -3%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS	1549 Points ∼86% -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	1481 Points ∼83% -16%
Average of class Office (531 – 1974, n=126, last 2 years)	1368 Points ∼76% -22%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	17 fps ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	17 fps ∼100% 0%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	13.8 fps ∼81% -19%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS	12.8 fps ∼75% -25%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	12.7 fps ∼75% -25%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	12.4 fps ∼73% -27%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U	10.8 fps ∼64% -36%
Average of class Office (0.63 – 17, n=128, last 2 years)	7.58 fps ∼45% -55%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS	66.2 s * ∼100% -31%
Average of class Office (23.6 – 210, n=128, last 2 years)	58.6 s * ∼89% -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	51.8 s * ∼78% -3%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	50.5 s * ∼76%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	50.5 s * ∼76% -0%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U	45.5 s * ∼69% +10%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	42.8 s * ∼65% +15%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	40.3 s * ∼61% +20%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Office (0.4244 – 2.07, n=129, last 2 years)	0.644 sec * ∼100% -33%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	0.518 sec * ∼80% -7%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS	0.511 sec * ∼79% -6%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U	0.4948 sec * ∼77% -2%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	0.4835 sec * ∼75%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	0.4835 sec * ∼75% -0%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4587 sec * ∼71% +5%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	0.4578 sec * ∼71% +5%

* … smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2360 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

137 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.9 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

247 Points

Help

Performance Rating
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	94.1 pt ∼94%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	94.1 pt ∼94%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M	71.9 pt ∼72%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	66.7 pt ∼67%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	62.8 pt ∼63%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	62.2 pt ∼62%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	50 pt ∼50%
Average of class Office	40.6 pt ∼41%

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	24250 KRay/s ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	24250 KRay/s ∼100% 0%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M	14040 KRay/s ∼58% -42%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	12366 KRay/s ∼51% -49%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	11296 KRay/s ∼47% -53%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	9618 KRay/s ∼40% -60%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	8830 KRay/s ∼36% -64%
Average of class Office (109 – 24250, n=128, last 2 years)	6993 KRay/s ∼29% -71%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	101262 Points ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	101262 Points ∼100% 0%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M	88935 Points ∼88% -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	72393 Points ∼71% -29%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	61721 Points ∼61% -39%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	48441 Points ∼48% -52%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	43149 Points ∼43% -57%
Average of class Office (3414 – 101262, n=128, last 2 years)	36435 Points ∼36% -64%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	4418 MB/s ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	4418 MB/s ∼100% 0%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M	3000 MB/s ∼68% -32%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	2850 MB/s ∼65% -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	2421 MB/s ∼55% -45%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2404 MB/s ∼54% -46%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	2265 MB/s ∼51% -49%
Average of class Office (125 – 4418, n=127, last 2 years)	1711 MB/s ∼39% -61%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	113016 Points ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	113016 Points ∼100% 0%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M	97802 Points ∼87% -13%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	91588 Points ∼81% -19%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	89068 Points ∼79% -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	87943 Points ∼78% -22%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	62953 Points ∼56% -44%
Average of class Office (3308 – 113016, n=128, last 2 years)	57826 Points ∼51% -49%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	14147 Points ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	14147 Points ∼100% 0%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M	12369 Points ∼87% -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	11085 Points ∼78% -22%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	8278 Points ∼59% -41%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	6597 Points ∼47% -53%
Average of class Office (404 – 14169, n=128, last 2 years)	5694 Points ∼40% -60%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	5206 Points ∼37% -63%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	54003 Points ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	54003 Points ∼100% 0%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M	48895 Points ∼91% -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	39771 Points ∼74% -26%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	30137 Points ∼56% -44%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	23884 Points ∼44% -56%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	21556 Points ∼40% -60%
Average of class Office (1864 – 54003, n=128, last 2 years)	19695 Points ∼36% -64%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	87671 MB/s ∼100% +15%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	76133 MB/s ∼87%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	76133 MB/s ∼87% 0%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	69002 MB/s ∼79% -9%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M	58851 MB/s ∼67% -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	47956 MB/s ∼55% -37%
Average of class Office (189 – 107331, n=128, last 2 years)	45948 MB/s ∼52% -40%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	41994 MB/s ∼48% -45%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	987 MB/s ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	987 MB/s ∼100% 0%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	962 MB/s ∼97% -3%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M	753 MB/s ∼76% -24%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	686 MB/s ∼70% -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	650 MB/s ∼66% -34%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	640 MB/s ∼65% -35%
Average of class Office (67.6 – 987, n=128, last 2 years)	435 MB/s ∼44% -56%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	12755 KRay/s ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	12755 KRay/s ∼100% 0%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M	7053 KRay/s ∼55% -45%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	6587 KRay/s ∼52% -48%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	5967 KRay/s ∼47% -53%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5193 KRay/s ∼41% -59%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	4640 KRay/s ∼36% -64%
Average of class Office (59 – 12755, n=128, last 2 years)	3751 KRay/s ∼29% -71%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	44535 MPixel/s ∼100% +85%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	39231 MPixel/s ∼88% +63%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	29949 MPixel/s ∼67% +25%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	25949 MPixel/s ∼58% +8%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	24030 MPixel/s ∼54%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	24030 MPixel/s ∼54% 0%
Average of class Office (2193 – 48177, n=128, last 2 years)	21464 MPixel/s ∼48% -11%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M	18989 MPixel/s ∼43% -21%

The EliteBook 845 G10 is a very responsive laptop in everyday use and the RAM’s single-channel configuration does not have a negative impact here either. The synthetic benchmark results are also good; only in the cross-system CrossMark test do AMD systems perform a little weaker. No issues occurred during testing and we were able to upgrade the RAM without any problems.

PCMark 10 / Score
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6623 Points ∼100% +2%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6523 Points ∼98%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	6523 Points ∼98% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N	6152 Points ∼93% -6%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA Radeon 680M, R9 PRO 6950HS, WDC PC SN810 1TB	5896 Points ∼89% -10%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	5672 Points ∼86% -13%
Dell Latitude 7440 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1345U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	5554 Points ∼84% -15%
Average of class Office (2325 – 6523, n=106, last 2 years)	4984 Points ∼75% -24%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Dell Latitude 7440 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1345U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	10758 Points ∼100% +9%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	10440 Points ∼97% +6%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	9883 Points ∼92% 0%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	9873 Points ∼92%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	9873 Points ∼92% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N	9848 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Office (5095 – 11807, n=106, last 2 years)	9403 Points ∼87% -5%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA Radeon 680M, R9 PRO 6950HS, WDC PC SN810 1TB	9311 Points ∼87% -6%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	9192 Points ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	9192 Points ∼100% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N	8891 Points ∼97% -3%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	8530 Points ∼93% -7%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA Radeon 680M, R9 PRO 6950HS, WDC PC SN810 1TB	8187 Points ∼89% -11%
Dell Latitude 7440 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1345U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	7189 Points ∼78% -22%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	7180 Points ∼78% -22%
Average of class Office (3053 – 9462, n=106, last 2 years)	6983 Points ∼76% -24%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	8855 Points ∼100% +7%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	8299 Points ∼94%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	8299 Points ∼94% 0%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA Radeon 680M, R9 PRO 6950HS, WDC PC SN810 1TB	7298 Points ∼82% -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N	7217 Points ∼82% -13%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	6982 Points ∼79% -16%
Dell Latitude 7440 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1345U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	6012 Points ∼68% -28%
Average of class Office (1912 – 8299, n=106, last 2 years)	5194 Points ∼59% -37%

CrossMark / Overall
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	1876 Points ∼100% +32%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1654 Points ∼88% +16%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N	1430 Points ∼76% 0%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1423 Points ∼76%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	1423 Points ∼76% 0%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA Radeon 680M, R9 PRO 6950HS, WDC PC SN810 1TB	1345 Points ∼72% -5%
Average of class Office (440 – 1773, n=90, last 2 years)	1227 Points ∼65% -14%

CrossMark / Productivity
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	1829 Points ∼100% +31%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1625 Points ∼89% +16%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N	1426 Points ∼78% +2%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1400 Points ∼77%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	1400 Points ∼77% 0%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA Radeon 680M, R9 PRO 6950HS, WDC PC SN810 1TB	1389 Points ∼76% -1%
Average of class Office (513 – 1709, n=90, last 2 years)	1261 Points ∼69% -10%

CrossMark / Creativity
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	1917 Points ∼100% +24%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1727 Points ∼90% +11%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1549 Points ∼81%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	1549 Points ∼81% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N	1523 Points ∼79% -2%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA Radeon 680M, R9 PRO 6950HS, WDC PC SN810 1TB	1376 Points ∼72% -11%
Average of class Office (424 – 1875, n=90, last 2 years)	1237 Points ∼65% -20%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	1899 Points ∼100% +64%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1531 Points ∼81% +32%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N	1194 Points ∼63% +3%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1161 Points ∼61%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	1161 Points ∼61% 0%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA Radeon 680M, R9 PRO 6950HS, WDC PC SN810 1TB	1142 Points ∼60% -2%
Average of class Office (284 – 1746, n=90, last 2 years)	1120 Points ∼59% -4%

PCMark 10 Score		6523 points
Help

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	64187 MB/s ∼100% +84%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	57716 MB/s ∼90% +65%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	47829 MB/s ∼75% +37%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	47562 MB/s ∼74% +36%
Average of class Office (7158 – 71202, n=128, last 2 years)	37392 MB/s ∼58% +7%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	34938 MB/s ∼54%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	34938 MB/s ∼54% 0%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M	31160 MB/s ∼49% -11%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	63509 MB/s ∼100% +110%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	50185 MB/s ∼79% +66%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	39944 MB/s ∼63% +32%
Average of class Office (7325 – 70553, n=128, last 2 years)	39334 MB/s ∼62% +30%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	37476 MB/s ∼59% +24%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M	34753 MB/s ∼55% +15%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	30289 MB/s ∼48%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	30289 MB/s ∼48% 0%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	83155 MB/s ∼100% +107%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	72373 MB/s ∼87% +80%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	50920 MB/s ∼61% +27%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	47179 MB/s ∼57% +17%
Average of class Office (7579 – 88993, n=128, last 2 years)	40598 MB/s ∼49% +1%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	40169 MB/s ∼48%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	40169 MB/s ∼48% 0%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M	33060 MB/s ∼40% -18%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	115.9 ns * ∼100% -13%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	106.4 ns * ∼92% -4%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	102.6 ns * ∼89%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	102.6 ns * ∼89% -0%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	102.1 ns * ∼88% -0%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M	99.7 ns * ∼86% +3%
Average of class Office (57.8 – 336, n=129, last 2 years)	94.5 ns * ∼82% +8%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	92.7 ns * ∼80% +10%

* … smaller is better

The test device shows no limitations in our standardized latency test (web browsing, 4K YouTube playback, CPU load) with the present BIOS version. Hence, the use of real-time audio applications without errors is possible.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon – interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	6070.1 μs * ∼100% -770%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA Radeon 680M, R9 PRO 6950HS, WDC PC SN810 1TB	1220 μs * ∼20% -75%
Dell Latitude 7440 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1345U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1203.08 μs * ∼20% -73%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	868.4 μs * ∼14% -25%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	697.4 μs * ∼11%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N	545.7 μs * ∼9% +22%

* … smaller is better

HP equips the EliteBook 845 G10 with a fast PCIe 4.0 slot for M.2 2280 SSDs and our test device has the 1 TB version of the SK hynix PC801 installed, with 895 GB available upon booting up for the first time. Transfer rates are very good overall and no performance drops occur under prolonged load. More SSD benchmarks are available here.

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
7123 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
5911 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
422 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
441 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
62.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
127.8 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8:
469 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8:
1096 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating – Percent
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	90.3 pt ∼90%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	87.1 pt ∼87%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	67.8 pt ∼68%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	66.3 pt ∼66%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA WDC PC SN810 1TB	57.5 pt ∼58%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N	46.5 pt ∼47%
Dell Latitude 7440 Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	42.9 pt ∼43%
Average of class Office	41.8 pt ∼42%

DiskSpd
seq read
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3878 (3830.24^min – 3878.26^max) MB/s ∼100% +30%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (2511 – 4861, n=8)	3598 MB/s ∼93% +20%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA WDC PC SN810 1TB	3391 (3051.13^min – 3390.68^max) MB/s ∼87% +13%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2989 (2968.66^min – 2989.28^max) MB/s ∼77%
Dell Latitude 7440 Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	2443 (2427.84^min – 2443.39^max) MB/s ∼63% -18%
Average of class Office (215 – 4278, n=106, last 2 years)	2131 MB/s ∼55% -29%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	2089 (1958.25^min – 2089.39^max) MB/s ∼54% -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N	1814 (1799.32^min – 1814.39^max) MB/s ∼47% -39%
seq write
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (3566 – 5181, n=8)	4420 MB/s ∼100% +24%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4000 (3970.36^min – 3999.69^max) MB/s ∼90% +12%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	3772 (213.28^min – 3772.36^max) MB/s ∼85% +6%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3566 (3496.37^min – 3566.41^max) MB/s ∼81%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA WDC PC SN810 1TB	3403 (3306.47^min – 3402.84^max) MB/s ∼77% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N	2284 (2236.61^min – 2283.64^max) MB/s ∼52% -36%
Average of class Office (56.3 – 4984, n=106, last 2 years)	1966 MB/s ∼44% -45%
Dell Latitude 7440 Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1776 (1737.28^min – 1776.3^max) MB/s ∼40% -50%
seq q8 t1 read
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA WDC PC SN810 1TB	6878 (6719.69^min – 6878.45^max) MB/s ∼100% +3%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6876 (6162.32^min – 6876.44^max) MB/s ∼100% +3%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (6570 – 7177, n=8)	6858 MB/s ∼100% +3%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6683 (6134.38^min – 6682.57^max) MB/s ∼97%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	4886 (4359.86^min – 4886.36^max) MB/s ∼71% -27%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N	3569 (3249.75^min – 3568.72^max) MB/s ∼52% -47%
Dell Latitude 7440 Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	3519 (2577.61^min – 3518.81^max) MB/s ∼51% -47%
Average of class Office (200 – 6922, n=106, last 2 years)	3339 MB/s ∼49% -50%
seq q8 t1 write
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (6037 – 6130, n=8)	6098 MB/s ∼100% +1%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6037 (6002.26^min – 6037.19^max) MB/s ∼99%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA WDC PC SN810 1TB	5097 (4682.59^min – 5097^max) MB/s ∼84% -16%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4970 (4966.69^min – 4970.17^max) MB/s ∼82% -18%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	3881 (113.46^min – 3881.41^max) MB/s ∼64% -36%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N	3296 (3265.03^min – 3296.3^max) MB/s ∼54% -45%
Average of class Office (57 – 6111, n=106, last 2 years)	2354 MB/s ∼39% -61%
Dell Latitude 7440 Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	2210 (2175.38^min – 2210.17^max) MB/s ∼36% -63%
4k q1 t1 read
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	88.6 (88.22^min – 88.59^max) MB/s ∼100% +46%
Dell Latitude 7440 Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	78.8 (76.59^min – 78.83^max) MB/s ∼89% +30%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (60.7 – 80, n=8)	72.7 MB/s ∼82% +20%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	60.7 (60^min – 60.68^max) MB/s ∼69%
Average of class Office (9.03 – 94.3, n=106, last 2 years)	54.3 MB/s ∼61% -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N	52.8 (52.12^min – 52.82^max) MB/s ∼60% -13%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA WDC PC SN810 1TB	52.4 (51.33^min – 52.35^max) MB/s ∼59% -14%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	43.7 (23.85^min – 43.65^max) MB/s ∼49% -28%
4k q1 t1 write
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	360 (353.95^min – 359.55^max) MB/s ∼100% +172%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (132.4 – 319, n=8)	229 MB/s ∼64% +73%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	224 (221.2^min – 223.61^max) MB/s ∼62% +69%
Average of class Office (14.3 – 292, n=106, last 2 years)	158.5 MB/s ∼44% +20%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N	136 (132.51^min – 136.03^max) MB/s ∼38% +3%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	132.4 (130.43^min – 132.37^max) MB/s ∼37%
Dell Latitude 7440 Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	131.4 (129.27^min – 131.42^max) MB/s ∼37% -1%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA WDC PC SN810 1TB	126.8 (125.06^min – 126.77^max) MB/s ∼35% -4%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3484 (3457.82^min – 3484.34^max) MB/s ∼100% +255%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (681 – 5829, n=8)	3114 MB/s ∼89% +217%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	2252 (2223.45^min – 2252.41^max) MB/s ∼65% +130%
Average of class Office (27.4 – 4425, n=106, last 2 years)	1127 MB/s ∼32% +15%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA WDC PC SN810 1TB	1042 (982.95^min – 1042.32^max) MB/s ∼30% +6%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	981 (956.75^min – 980.97^max) MB/s ∼28%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N	810 (760.4^min – 810.14^max) MB/s ∼23% -17%
Dell Latitude 7440 Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	476 (466.05^min – 475.52^max) MB/s ∼14% -51%
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	2554 (2537.7^min – 2554.39^max) MB/s ∼100% +460%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (456 – 3719, n=8)	1877 MB/s ∼73% +312%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	1611 (217.51^min – 1610.59^max) MB/s ∼63% +253%
Average of class Office (18.8 – 2831, n=106, last 2 years)	839 MB/s ∼33% +84%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	456 (447.45^min – 455.69^max) MB/s ∼18%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N	418 (406.66^min – 418.33^max) MB/s ∼16% -8%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA WDC PC SN810 1TB	407 (392.45^min – 407.12^max) MB/s ∼16% -11%
Dell Latitude 7440 Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	360 (355.44^min – 360.36^max) MB/s ∼14% -21%

AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	8363 Points ∼100% +41%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (5903 – 10562, n=8)	8071 Points ∼97% +36%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	6213 Points ∼74% +5%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5918 Points ∼71%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA WDC PC SN810 1TB	4459 Points ∼53% -25%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N	3837 Points ∼46% -35%
Dell Latitude 7440 Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	3533 Points ∼42% -40%
Average of class Office (125 – 9204, n=106, last 2 years)	3497 Points ∼42% -41%
Score Read
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3090 Points ∼100% +118%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	2872 Points ∼93% +102%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (1335 – 3793, n=8)	2492 Points ∼81% +76%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1419 Points ∼46%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA WDC PC SN810 1TB	1353 Points ∼44% -5%
Average of class Office (49 – 3364, n=106, last 2 years)	1304 Points ∼42% -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N	1090 Points ∼35% -23%
Dell Latitude 7440 Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1028 Points ∼33% -28%
Score Write
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (3831 – 5157, n=8)	4348 Points ∼100% +13%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3831 Points ∼88%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3765 Points ∼87% -2%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA WDC PC SN810 1TB	2475 Points ∼57% -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N	2234 Points ∼51% -42%
Dell Latitude 7440 Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	2029 Points ∼47% -47%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	1894 Points ∼44% -51%
Average of class Office (39 – 4111, n=106, last 2 years)	1567 Points ∼36% -59%
Seq Read
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (4270 – 5892, n=8)	5432 MB/s ∼100% +27%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	5315 MB/s ∼98% +24%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	4270 MB/s ∼79%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	3934 MB/s ∼72% -8%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA WDC PC SN810 1TB	3823 MB/s ∼70% -10%
Dell Latitude 7440 Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	3017.95 MB/s ∼56% -29%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N	2860 MB/s ∼53% -33%
Average of class Office (266 – 5739, n=106, last 2 years)	2693 MB/s ∼50% -37%
Seq Write
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (2808 – 5880, n=8)	4440 MB/s ∼100% +56%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3766 MB/s ∼85% +32%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	3205 MB/s ∼72% +12%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2853 MB/s ∼64%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA WDC PC SN810 1TB	2378 MB/s ∼54% -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N	1718 MB/s ∼39% -40%
Average of class Office (52.2 – 5880, n=106, last 2 years)	1696 MB/s ∼38% -41%
Dell Latitude 7440 Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1520.78 MB/s ∼34% -47%
4K Read
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	96.2 MB/s ∼100% +63%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	80.26 MB/s ∼83% +36%
Dell Latitude 7440 Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	72.35 MB/s ∼75% +23%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (58.4 – 79.4, n=8)	67.7 MB/s ∼70% +15%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	59 MB/s ∼61%
Average of class Office (8.89 – 88.1, n=106, last 2 years)	53.3 MB/s ∼55% -10%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA WDC PC SN810 1TB	53 MB/s ∼55% -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N	51.93 MB/s ∼54% -12%
4K Write
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (152 – 280, n=8)	234 MB/s ∼100% +54%
Dell Latitude 7440 Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	197.6 MB/s ∼84% +30%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	192.61 MB/s ∼82% +27%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	189.9 MB/s ∼81% +25%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	152 MB/s ∼65%
Average of class Office (13.9 – 272, n=106, last 2 years)	151.6 MB/s ∼65% 0%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA WDC PC SN810 1TB	139 MB/s ∼59% -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N	135.21 MB/s ∼58% -11%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	2478.53 MB/s ∼100% +166%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	2382 MB/s ∼96% +155%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (741 – 3131, n=8)	1881 MB/s ∼76% +102%
Average of class Office (13.1 – 2713, n=106, last 2 years)	977 MB/s ∼39% +5%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	933 MB/s ∼38%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA WDC PC SN810 1TB	917 MB/s ∼37% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N	751.92 MB/s ∼30% -19%
Dell Latitude 7440 Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	654.24 MB/s ∼26% -30%
4K-64 Write
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (3280 – 4381, n=8)	3670 MB/s ∼100% +8%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3394 MB/s ∼92%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3195.52 MB/s ∼87% -6%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA WDC PC SN810 1TB	2097 MB/s ∼57% -38%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N	1926.82 MB/s ∼53% -43%
Dell Latitude 7440 Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1678.93 MB/s ∼46% -51%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	1384 MB/s ∼38% -59%
Average of class Office (17.7 – 3394, n=106, last 2 years)	1245 MB/s ∼34% -63%
Access Time Read
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	0.136 ms * ∼100% -339%
Dell Latitude 7440 Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	0.098 ms * ∼72% -216%
Average of class Office (0.022 – 0.389, n=105, last 2 years)	0.09164 ms * ∼67% -196%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA WDC PC SN810 1TB	0.074 ms * ∼54% -139%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N	0.061 ms * ∼45% -97%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (0.03 – 0.041, n=8)	0.03338 ms * ∼25% -8%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	0.031 ms * ∼23%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	0.022 ms * ∼16% +29%
Access Time Write
Dell Latitude 7440 Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	0.091 ms * ∼100% -264%
Average of class Office (0.017 – 0.717, n=106, last 2 years)	0.08885 ms * ∼98% -255%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (0.017 – 0.058, n=8)	0.041 ms * ∼45% -64%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	0.03 ms * ∼33% -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N	0.028 ms * ∼31% -12%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA WDC PC SN810 1TB	0.026 ms * ∼29% -4%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	0.025 ms * ∼27%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	0.022 ms * ∼24% +12%

* … smaller is better

Graphics processing is handled by the integrated Radeon 780M. The preview driver from April was still installed on our test device upon delivery, but we installed the new Adrenalin, version 23.7.2, which did not confer any speed advantage. Graphics performance is severely limited by the RAM’s single-channel configuration and so the 780M is unable to unfold its full potential as a result. Consequently, graphics performance is roughly on par with the Iris Xe Graphics G7 from Intel and only slightly ahead of the old Vega 8 from AMD. Users can very easily boost graphics performance with a dual-channel configuration, although this is certainly not a priority for a business laptop. A second RAM bar delivers 65% higher results on average, as already shown in our test of the iGPU. All in all, performance remains almost on the same level as the old Radeon 680M.

GPU performance is not reduced in battery mode and the values remain stable under sustained load. More GPU benchmarks are listed here.

3DMark Performance Rating – Percent
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	100 pt ∼100%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	62.9 pt ∼63%
Average AMD Radeon 780M	61.3 pt ∼61%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	49.8 pt ∼50%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	39.7 pt ∼40%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	38.2 pt ∼38%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS	33.9 pt ∼34%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1345U	32 pt ∼32%
Average of class Office	28.2 pt ∼28%

3DMark 11 – 1280×720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	16904 Points ∼100% +115%
Average AMD Radeon 780M (7868 – 12978, n=7)	11849 Points ∼70% +51%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (Dual-Channel)	11811 Points ∼70% +50%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	9608 Points ∼57% +22%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	7868 Points ∼47%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS	7179 Points ∼42% -9%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	6752 Points ∼40% -14%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1345U	5485 Points ∼32% -30%
Average of class Office (599 – 11811, n=121, last 2 years)	5172 Points ∼31% -34%

3DMark
1920×1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	12349 Points ∼100% +171%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (Dual-Channel)	7800 Points ∼63% +71%
Average AMD Radeon 780M (4550 – 7980, n=8)	7304 Points ∼59% +61%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	6431 Points ∼52% +41%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	5477 Points ∼44% +20%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	4550 Points ∼37%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1345U	4442 Points ∼36% -2%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS	3791 Points ∼31% -17%
Average of class Office (712 – 7800, n=122, last 2 years)	3627 Points ∼29% -20%
2560×1440 Time Spy Graphics
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	4773 Points ∼100% +219%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (Dual-Channel)	2659 Points ∼56% +78%
Average AMD Radeon 780M (1496 – 2910, n=8)	2602 Points ∼55% +74%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	1938 Points ∼41% +30%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	1656 Points ∼35% +11%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	1496 Points ∼31%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS	1359 Points ∼28% -9%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1345U	1318 Points ∼28% -12%
Average of class Office (242 – 2659, n=119, last 2 years)	1173 Points ∼25% -22%

3DMark 11 Performance		7732 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		25056 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		4187 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		1707 points
Help

If you want to play on the EliteBook 845 G10 after work, you should definitely install a second RAM stick because the advantage over the single-channel configuration is a whopping 55% in the gaming benchmarks. Overall, performance values remain comparable to the old Radeon 680M. In practice, this is sufficient for smooth gameplay in 1080p at medium to high details in numerous games. Performance remains constant in battery mode and no performance drops occur during long gaming sessions.

Performance Rating – Percent
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	100 pt ∼100%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	49.7 pt ∼50%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE ^-1! AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M	46.6 pt ∼47%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	38.3 pt ∼38%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, AMD Radeon 680M	32.2 pt ∼32%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	32.1 pt ∼32%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	30 pt ∼30%
Average of class Office	26.6 pt ∼27%

The Witcher 3 – 1920×1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	44.2 (42^min, 42^P1) fps ∼100% +209%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M	24.5 (19^min) fps ∼55% +71%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (Dual-Channel)	24 fps ∼54% +68%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	16.4 fps ∼37% +15%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, AMD Radeon 680M	14.6 fps ∼33% +2%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	14.3 (12^min, 13^P1) fps ∼32%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	13.4 (12^min) fps ∼30% -6%
Average of class Office (2.44 – 24.5, n=105, last 2 years)	11.8 fps ∼27% -17%

GTA V – 1920×1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	67.5 (9.08^min, 43.5^P1) fps ∼100% +453%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (Dual-Channel)	22.3 (3.35^min, 15.4^P1) fps ∼33% +83%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, AMD Radeon 680M	20 (4.3^min, 15.9^P1) fps ∼30% +64%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	12.2 (4.27^min, 8.4^P1) fps ∼18%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	11.5 (6.52^min, 7.87^P1) fps ∼17% -6%
Average of class Office (3.03 – 33.7, n=84, last 2 years)	9.49 fps ∼14% -22%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	8.81 (4.42^min, 5.46^P1) fps ∼13% -28%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark – 1920×1080 High Quality
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)	50.1 fps ∼100% +215%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1.3, Dual-Channel)	26.7 fps ∼53% +68%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M (1.3)	21.7 fps ∼43% +36%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1.3)	19 fps ∼38% +19%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1.3)	16.8 fps ∼34% +6%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1.3)	15.9 fps ∼32%
Average of class Office (2.03 – 26.7, n=91, last 2 years)	13.1 fps ∼26% -18%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, AMD Radeon 680M (1.3)	12.9 fps ∼26% -19%

Strange Brigade – 1920×1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	86 (52.1^min, 63.8^P1) fps ∼100% +244%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Dual-Channel)	45.2 (23.1^min, 34.8^P1) fps ∼53% +81%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	38.3 (9.8^min, 26.4^P1) fps ∼45% +53%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	28.7 (6.7^min, 10.1^P1) fps ∼33% +15%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	25 (17.4^min, 19.8^P1) fps ∼29%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, AMD Radeon 680M (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	22.6 (16.5^min, 17.5^P1) fps ∼26% -10%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	21.9 (5^min, 6.24^P1) fps ∼25% -12%
Average of class Office (6.6 – 45.2, n=88, last 2 years)	21.1 fps ∼25% -16%

Dota 2 Reborn – 1920×1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	109.1 (95.7^min) fps ∼100% +112%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (Dual-Channel)	71.6 (59.9^min) fps ∼66% +39%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	59.6 (50.1^min) fps ∼55% +16%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M	56.6 (49^min) fps ∼52% +10%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	56.3 (41.5^min) fps ∼52% +9%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	51.5 (43.1^min) fps ∼47%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, AMD Radeon 680M	47.4 (41.4^min) fps ∼43% -8%
Average of class Office (7.8 – 101.1, n=131, last 2 years)	39.9 fps ∼37% -23%

X-Plane 11.11 – 1920×1080 high (fps_test=3)
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	82.3 fps ∼100% +192%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	40.8 fps ∼50% +45%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (Dual-Channel)	32.2 fps ∼39% +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M	31.2 fps ∼38% +11%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, AMD Radeon 680M	28.9 fps ∼35% +2%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	28.2 fps ∼34%
Average of class Office (5.55 – 73.4, n=128, last 2 years)	25.8 fps ∼31% -9%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	21.3 fps ∼26% -24%

The Witcher 3 – 1920×1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	44.2 (42^min, 42^P1) fps ∼100% +209%
Average AMD Radeon 780M (14.3 – 31.5, n=6)	25.3 fps ∼57% +77%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M	24.5 (19^min) fps ∼55% +71%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (Dual-Channel)	24 fps ∼54% +68%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	16.4 fps ∼37% +15%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, AMD Radeon 680M	14.6 fps ∼33% +2%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	14.3 (12^min, 13^P1) fps ∼32%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	13.4 (12^min) fps ∼30% -6%
Average of class Office (2.44 – 24.5, n=105, last 2 years)	11.8 fps ∼27% -17%

F1 22 – 1920×1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (923650)	93 (74^min, 63^P1) fps ∼100% +193%
Average AMD Radeon 780M (31.7 – 66.3, n=6)	52.2 fps ∼56% +65%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (Dual-Channel)	52 (45^min, 41^P1) fps ∼56% +64%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (959964)	33.6 (29^min, 27^P1) fps ∼36% +6%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (959964)	31.7 (26^min, 23^P1) fps ∼34%
Average of class Office (9.78 – 52, n=24, last 2 years)	27.9 fps ∼30% -12%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (959964)	25.6 (21^min, 21^P1) fps ∼28% -19%

Far Cry 5 – 1920×1080 High Preset AA:T
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	79 fps ∼100% +259%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (Dual-Channel)	36 fps ∼46% +64%
Average AMD Radeon 780M (22 – 41, n=5)	34.2 fps ∼43% +55%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	29 (26^min) fps ∼37% +32%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	22 fps ∼28%
Average of class Office (1 – 36, n=35, last 2 years)	20 fps ∼25% -9%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, AMD Radeon 680M	18 (16^min) fps ∼23% -18%

Cyberpunk 2077 1.5 – 1920×1080 High Preset
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	40 fps ∼100% +233%
Average AMD Radeon 780M (12 – 30.5, n=5)	22.2 fps ∼56% +85%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (Dual-Channel)	20 fps ∼50% +67%
Average of class Office (8.9 – 20, n=11, last 2 years)	12.7 fps ∼32% +6%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	12 fps ∼30%
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	11.3 (8.8^min) fps ∼28% -6%

Probably the biggest weakness of the EliteBook 845 G10 is the single fan and 35-watt processor combination. When idle, the latter is almost always deactivated, but even light tasks cause the fan to fire up too quickly. This also applies to the most efficient performance mode, since the CPU can still consume 35 watts here. Fan noise increases quite quickly to 43 dB(A) under load, which is clearly audible. Furthermore, the fan speed always pulsates a bit, which sounds restless and can be annoying in the long run. Again, we believe that models with a U-series processor perform better in everyday use. Otherwise, no other electronic noises were heard in our test device.

Noise Level

Idle		25.3 / 25.3 / 25.3 dB(A)
Load		34.4 / 43.4 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.3 dB(A)

	HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N	Dell Latitude 7440 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1345U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA Radeon 680M, R9 PRO 6950HS, WDC PC SN810 1TB
Noise		21%	15%	-6%	-7%	-3%
off / environment *	25.3	22.8 10%	22.8 10%	25.4 -0%	24.4 4%	25.5 -1%
Idle Minimum *	25.3	22.8 10%	22.8 10%	25.4 -0%	24.4 4%	25.5 -1%
Idle Average *	25.3	22.8 10%	22.8 10%	25.4 -0%	24.4 4%	25.5 -1%
Idle Maximum *	25.3	22.8 10%	22.8 10%	29.6 -17%	27.8 -10%	25.5 -1%
Load Average *	34.4	22.8 34%	26.3 24%	42 -22%	43.3 -26%	38.1 -11%
Witcher 3 ultra *	43.4	27.5 37%	30 31%		48.2 -11%
Load Maximum *	43.4	27.3 37%	38.3 12%	40.9 6%	48.8 -12%	44 -1%

* … smaller is better

No issues of temperature arise in everyday use, but if you stress the processor for long periods of time, the central rear area on the underside heats up significantly and we measure temperatures of more than 50 °C here. Due to the single fan, the left side of the case also gets noticeably warmer. This is also apparent when typing under load, but there are no restrictions here. The CPU quickly settles at a consumption of 41 watts and remains constant at this level.

CPU/iGPU data - stress test — CPU/iGPU data – stress test


44.8 °C 113 F	45.6 °C 114 F	40.4 °C 105 F
43.6 °C 110 F	43.9 °C 111 F	37.9 °C 100 F
36.2 °C 97 F	31.5 °C 89 F	29 °C 84 F

Maximum: 45.6 °C = 114 F
Average: 39.2 °C = 103 F


39.5 °C 103 F	51.9 °C 125 F	47.7 °C 118 F
33.9 °C 93 F	48.1 °C 119 F	45.7 °C 114 F
31.2 °C 88 F	35.6 °C 96 F	37.2 °C 99 F

Maximum: 51.9 °C = 125 F
Average: 41.2 °C = 106 F

Power Supply (max.) 46.3 °C = 115 F | Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.6 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.9 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.2 °C / 97.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-8.4 °C / -15.2 F).

The two stereo speakers can get very loud and deliver very good quality overall, especially for a business computer. The two modules only lack vigor, which is why we recommend headphones or external speakers for louder music and films. Speech intelligibility, such as during conferences, is very good.

The EliteBook 845 G10 with the 120 Hz display is more economical than the SureView display, but also consumes more power than the low-power 1080p panel. It becomes somewhat problematic under load because the 65 watt power supply constantly reaches its limit due to the high power limit and is unable to charge the battery in this scenario. A 90-watt power supply would have been a better choice for the HS processor.

HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS, 2560×1600, 14.00

Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M, SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N, LTPS IPS LED, 1920×1200, 14.00

Dell Latitude 7440
i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV, IPS, 2560×1600, 14.00

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, , IPS, 3120×2080, 14.20

SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2880×1800, 14.00

HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
R9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS, 1920×1200, 14.00

Average AMD Radeon 780M

Average of class Office

Power Consumption

44%

19%

-38%

-23%

-1%

20%

Idle Minimum *

4.3

2.2

49%

4.5

-5%

4.1

7.5

-74%

6.4

-49%

5.12

HP installs a relatively small, 51 Wh battery that, together with the high-resolution panel, only allows for average runtimes. At a brightness of 150 cd/m² (corresponding to 45% of the maximum brightness in our test device), our video test runs for just over 9 hours and the WLAN test for almost 8 hours. In contrast, the WLAN test at maximum brightness lasted a little more than 5 hours. If you find this insufficient, you should choose a configuration with the low-power display. A full charge with the device switched on takes 2 hours, but 50% of the capacity is already available after about 34 minutes.

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing (Edge 115)		7h 51min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 115)		5h 10min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		9h 17min
Load (maximum brightness)		0h 56min

HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M, 51 Wh

Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M, 57 Wh

Dell Latitude 7440
i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 57 Wh

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh

SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh

HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
R9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M, 51 Wh

Average of class Office

Battery Runtime

108%

130%

46%

57%

30%

54%

H.264

557

527

-5%

666

20%

685

Pros

+ stable and high-quality case

+ 120 Hz display with P3 color space

+ very high CPU performance

+ very good keyboard

+ 5G module integrated, USB 4

+ good maintenance options

+ 5MP webcam

Cons

– test device only has single-channel RAM

– fan fires up quickly

– no SD card reader

– high-resolution display reduces battery life

– marginally sized power supply

The EliteBook 845 G10 is not HP’s flagship business notebook (but rather the EliteBook 1040 G10; review will follow shortly), but it is certainly one of the best business devices at the moment thanks to its fast AMD processor, sturdy aluminum case and excellent keyboard. Apart from the slightly more flexible display lid, the workmanship is very good and the CPU performance high. Theoretically, the laptop has a clear advantage over the Intel competition in terms of graphics performance, but this advantage is canceled out in our test device due to the RAM’s single-channel configuration. We don’t think many EliteBook customers will need more than 32GB of RAM, so a 2x 16GB configuration would certainly make more sense for the vast majority of customers.

Other advantages include the extensive security features, the good maintenance options, the large selection of ports (including USB 4), and the extensive service and warranty options. The EliteBook doesn’t have to shy away when it comes to the display either because the high-resolution 120 Hz screen offers great image quality without PWM flickering and is also very well calibrated ex works. However, the panel also requires more power than the regular 1080p version with 400 cd/m².

HP gets a lot right in the EliteBook 845 G10 and offers the best business notebook with an AMD processor and, at the same time, one of the best business models ever.

The CPU performance of the new Ryzen 9 Pro 7940HS is very solid and stable, but we believe that models with the U-series chips (e.g. the Ryzen 7 Pro 7840U) would be the better choice for the EliteBook 845 G10 in view of the cooling and the overactive fan.

Although our test device is one of the most expensive models, the cheaper versions of the EliteBook 845 G10 are also an interesting alternative thanks to the modern AMD processors. The model with the Ryzen Pro 5 and the LowPower 1080p display is already available for just over EUR 1,000 and the models with the 7840U start at around EUR 1,500 (these models do not appear to be available in the US at present). However, we would advise against the optional SureView display.

Among the competition, we’re especially curious about the new ThinkPad T14s G4, and we’ll also be looking at the more expensive EliteBook 1040 G4 shortly. If you need more graphics power, you should take a look at the Schenker Vision 14 with its RTX 3050 Ti.

The base version of the EliteBook 845 G10 is priced at US$2,007.00 in HP’s US webstore. Users have numerous configuration options, such as the processor, RAM and display, among other things.

HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
–
08/14/2023 v7

Andreas Osthoff

Connectivity

69 / 80 → 86%

Games Performance

63 / 78 → 80%

Application Performance

95 / 95 → 100%

Office – Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff – Managing Editor Business Laptops – 1517 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

I grew up with modern consumer electronics and my first computer was a Commodore C64, which encouraged my interest in building my own systems. I started working as a review editor for Notebookcheck during my dual studies at Siemens. Currently, I am mainly responsible for dealing with business laptops and mobile workstations. It’s a great experience to be able to review the latest devices and technologies and then compare them with each other.

Translator: Jacob Fisher – Translator – 244 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Growing up in regional Australia, I first became acquainted with computers in my early teens after a broken leg from a football (soccer) match temporarily condemned me to a predominately indoor lifestyle. Soon afterwards I was building my own systems. Now I live in Germany, having moved here in 2014, where I study philosophy and anthropology. I am particularly fascinated by how computer technology has fundamentally and dramatically reshaped human culture, and how it continues to do so.

Andreas Osthoff, 2023-08-15 (Update: 2023-08-15)